Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Nucl Cardiol ; 2022 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2285117
2.
Am J Med ; 134(12): 1451-1456, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1442227

ABSTRACT

In this paper we highlight the presence of tachycardia in post-acute COVID-19 syndrome by introducing a new label for this phenomenon-post-COVID-19 tachycardia syndrome-and argue that this constitutes a phenotype or sub-syndrome in post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. We also discuss epidemiology, putative mechanisms, treatment options, and future research directions in this novel clinical syndrome.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Tachycardia, Sinus , COVID-19/physiopathology , COVID-19/therapy , Humans , Phenotype , SARS-CoV-2 , Syndrome , Tachycardia, Sinus/etiology , Tachycardia, Sinus/genetics , Tachycardia, Sinus/physiopathology , Tachycardia, Sinus/surgery , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
3.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 22(11): 1255-1256, 2021 10 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1373636
4.
Open Heart ; 8(2)2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1346091

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac diagnostic testing and practice and to assess its impact in different regions in Europe. METHODS: The online survey organised by the International Atomic Energy Agency Division of Human Health collected information on changes in cardiac imaging procedural volumes between March 2019 and March/April 2020. Data were collected from 909 centres in 108 countries. RESULTS: Centres in Northern and Southern Europe were more likely to cancel all outpatient activities compared with Western and Eastern Europe. There was a greater reduction in total procedure volumes in Europe compared with the rest of the world in March 2020 (45% vs 41%, p=0.003), with a more marked reduction in Southern Europe (58%), but by April 2020 this was similar in Europe and the rest of the world (69% vs 63%, p=0.261). Regional variations were apparent between imaging modalities, but the largest reductions were in Southern Europe for nearly all modalities. In March 2020, location in Southern Europe was the only independent predictor of the reduction in procedure volume. However, in April 2020, lower gross domestic product and higher COVID-19 deaths were the only independent predictors. CONCLUSION: The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on care of patients with cardiac disease, with substantial regional variations in Europe. This has potential long-term implications for patients and plans are required to enable the diagnosis of non-COVID-19 conditions during the ongoing pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiac Imaging Techniques/trends , Cardiologists/trends , Healthcare Disparities/trends , Heart Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Europe , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests
5.
Eur Heart J Suppl ; 22(Suppl Pt t): P1-P3, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-990637
6.
Am J Med ; 134(4): 482-489, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-812408

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We evaluated whether the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) pandemic was associated with changes in the pattern of acute cardiovascular admissions across European centers. METHODS: We set-up a multicenter, multinational, pan-European observational registry in 15 centers from 12 countries. All consecutive acute admissions to emergency departments and cardiology departments throughout a 1-month period during the COVID-19 outbreak were compared with an equivalent 1-month period in 2019. The acute admissions to cardiology departments were classified into 5 major categories: acute coronary syndrome, acute heart failure, arrhythmia, pulmonary embolism, and other. RESULTS: Data from 54,331 patients were collected and analyzed. Nine centers provided data on acute admissions to emergency departments comprising 50,384 patients: 20,226 in 2020 compared with 30,158 in 2019 (incidence rate ratio [IRR] with 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.66 [0.58-0.76]). The risk of death at the emergency departments was higher in 2020 compared to 2019 (odds ratio [OR] with 95% CI: 4.1 [3.0-5.8], P < 0.0001). All 15 centers provided data on acute cardiology departments admissions: 3007 patients in 2020 and 4452 in 2019; IRR (95% CI): 0.68 (0.64-0.71). In 2020, there were fewer admissions with IRR (95% CI): acute coronary syndrome: 0.68 (0.63-0.73); acute heart failure: 0.65 (0.58-0.74); arrhythmia: 0.66 (0.60-0.72); and other: 0.68(0.62-0.76). We found a relatively higher percentage of pulmonary embolism admissions in 2020: odds ratio (95% CI): 1.5 (1.1-2.1), P = 0.02. Among patients with acute coronary syndrome, there were fewer admissions with unstable angina: 0.79 (0.66-0.94); non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: 0.56 (0.50-0.64); and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 0.78 (0.68-0.89). CONCLUSION: In the European centers during the COVID-19 outbreak, there were fewer acute cardiovascular admissions. Also, fewer patients were admitted to the emergency departments with 4 times higher death risk at the emergency departments.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiology Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Myocardial Ischemia , Patient Admission , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/trends , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Ischemia/epidemiology , Myocardial Ischemia/therapy , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Patient Admission/trends , Registries/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL